Jump to: Page Content, Section Navigation, Site Navigation, Site Search, Account Information, or Site Tools.
|
|
News of the WeekU.S. SCIENCE POLICY:
Jeffrey Mervis |
|
CREDIT: KERRY ARNOT |
Even as the press briefing was taking place in the Capitol, three of the bill's co-sponsors were meeting at the White House with President George W. Bush to discuss a similar piece of legislation to bolster U.S. scientific prowess being prepared by Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN). That bill is expected to conform to an October report by the National Academies' National Research Council (Science, 21 October, p. 423).
Science lobbyists are thrilled by the bill's underlying message. The legislation "reflects a consensus among the nation's business and academic communities concerning actions we must take to ensure our future global competitiveness and our national security," says the Association of American Universities, which represents 62 research-intensive universities. ASTRA, a consortium that lobbies for increased spending in the physical sciences and engineering, calls the bill its number-one legislative priority in 2006.
All that support will go for naught, however, unless Congress loosens the purse strings. Despite a 2002 law calling for a 5-year doubling of NSF's budget, Congress actually cut the agency's budget last year and gave it only a small increase this year. Lieberman says he expects things to be different this time around: "There's a new sense of urgency and a new level of understanding about the importance of university-based research. I think we can do it."
Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)