Note to users. If you're seeing this message, it means that your browser cannot find this page's style/presentation instructions -- or possibly that you are using a browser that does not support current Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing, and what you can do to make your experience of our site the best it can be.
American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Site Tools

  • AAAS
  • Subscribe
  • Feedback

Site Search

Search Advanced

Science 12 July 1996:
Vol. 273. no. 5272, pp. 174 - 175
DOI:

Prev | Table of Contents | Next

News

Eliot Marshall

In the 10 years that an army of investigators and lawyers has been poring over data in the notebooks of Thereza Imanishi-Kari, looking for evidence that she committed scientific misconduct, the area of research she worked in has fallen out of favor. Thus, when a government appeals board last month threw out misconduct charges against her and delivered a blistering analysis of the government's evidence, the ruling spoke volumes about the way misconduct cases are handled. But in strict scientific terms, the paper at the heart of the dispute is no longer important. The science has simply moved on.




ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

ADVERTISEMENT
Click Me!

To Advertise     Find Products

Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)